<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Rejects Treaty to End Korean War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9441</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9441</guid>
		<description>If what I read on Wikipedia is correct, and what I remember from my youth, the Korean War was a United Nations conflict.  The United States called it a &quot;police action&quot; because there was no legitimate declaration of war by the US Congress.  It just beats me that the United States can now reject a peace treaty.  How utterly arrogant!  The United Nations should overrule the United States, and just go ahead.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If what I read on Wikipedia is correct, and what I remember from my youth, the Korean War was a United Nations conflict.  The United States called it a &quot;police action&quot; because there was no legitimate declaration of war by the US Congress.  It just beats me that the United States can now reject a peace treaty.  How utterly arrogant!  The United Nations should overrule the United States, and just go ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nonpareal</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9436</link>
		<dc:creator>nonpareal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9436</guid>
		<description> This is shaping up to be another 100 years war. But how can that be when war was never declared  by the US? This was supposed to be a police action by the UN. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is shaping up to be another 100 years war. But how can that be when war was never declared  by the US? This was supposed to be a police action by the UN.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti_Govt_Rebel</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9434</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti_Govt_Rebel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9434</guid>
		<description>This is what is called bargaining in bad faith.  I can&#039;t speak for North korea, but the US does not want peace or a peace treaty.  They are constantly thinking of reasons why they can&#039;t do it.  You&#039;d think somebody who wanted peace would rejoice at the offer of a peace treaty. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what is called bargaining in bad faith.  I can&#039;t speak for North korea, but the US does not want peace or a peace treaty.  They are constantly thinking of reasons why they can&#039;t do it.  You&#039;d think somebody who wanted peace would rejoice at the offer of a peace treaty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rtrvjoe@hotmail.com</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9432</link>
		<dc:creator>rtrvjoe@hotmail.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 01:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9432</guid>
		<description>Apeace treaty, would be an exceptance of N. Korea as a independent natio Yanks are never going to do that. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apeace treaty, would be an exceptance of N. Korea as a independent natio Yanks are never going to do that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: US Rejects Treaty to End Korean War &#171; NWO Observer</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9427</link>
		<dc:creator>US Rejects Treaty to End Korean War &#171; NWO Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 23:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9427</guid>
		<description>[...] Source: http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: <a href="http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/" rel="nofollow">http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ira7Epstein </title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9418</link>
		<dc:creator>Ira7Epstein </dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:39:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9418</guid>
		<description>  
Both the United States government and the North Korean government have a vested interest in maintaining hostile relations short of resumption of war.  The policies of the United States government, (refusal to formally end the Korean War, economic sanctions, and troops stationed on the Korean peninsula) provide a pretext to the North Korean government for its failed economic policies and role those policies have had in making North Koreans some of the poorest people on Earth.   The North Korean government provides the United States government with a pretext to maintain a large contingent of its troops in Southeast Asia.  It is a classic win/win situation for both governments, but not the people of either country.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the United States government and the North Korean government have a vested interest in maintaining hostile relations short of resumption of war.  The policies of the United States government, (refusal to formally end the Korean War, economic sanctions, and troops stationed on the Korean peninsula) provide a pretext to the North Korean government for its failed economic policies and role those policies have had in making North Koreans some of the poorest people on Earth.   The North Korean government provides the United States government with a pretext to maintain a large contingent of its troops in Southeast Asia.  It is a classic win/win situation for both governments, but not the people of either country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jojo</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9393</link>
		<dc:creator>jojo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 13:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9393</guid>
		<description> USA troops, if they leave Korea, Japan /Phillopines would be next. Uncle Sam is worried--no more king of the far east  castle. Empire busted for good! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USA troops, if they leave Korea, Japan /Phillopines would be next. Uncle Sam is worried&#8211;no more king of the far east  castle. Empire busted for good!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fisher</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9378</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fisher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:31:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9378</guid>
		<description>typical USA rethoric. how about worrying about the human rights treatment the Palestinians receive by the blessed hands of the children of david ? talk about being hypocritical. these Guys need to go broke. how many wars are they fighting now ? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>typical USA rethoric. how about worrying about the human rights treatment the Palestinians receive by the blessed hands of the children of david ? talk about being hypocritical. these Guys need to go broke. how many wars are they fighting now ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2010/01/11/us-rejects-treaty-to-end-korean-war/comment-page-1/#comment-9374</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=8312#comment-9374</guid>
		<description>How come its &quot;okay&quot; for America to have nuclear weapons but not North Korea?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How come its &quot;okay&quot; for America to have nuclear weapons but not North Korea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/23 queries in 0.093 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 07:00:09 -->
