<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton Insists US Doesn&#8217;t Have Long-Term Designs on Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hotaruSTAR16</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6621</link>
		<dc:creator>hotaruSTAR16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=7201#comment-6621</guid>
		<description>It is hard to believe that the U.S. does not have any long-term plans in Afghanistan. Whether or not Obama decides to stay in this war is going to draw criticism from opposite ends. Asia Chronicle has been giving some good insight on the situation in Afghanistan. Worth a read I think. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.asiachroniclenews.com&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;www.asiachroniclenews.com&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is hard to believe that the U.S. does not have any long-term plans in Afghanistan. Whether or not Obama decides to stay in this war is going to draw criticism from opposite ends. Asia Chronicle has been giving some good insight on the situation in Afghanistan. Worth a read I think. <a href="http://www.asiachroniclenews.com" target="_blank">http://www.asiachroniclenews.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b. russo</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6613</link>
		<dc:creator>b. russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=7201#comment-6613</guid>
		<description>No  designs ? Hilary, check your generals long terms building projects of superbases inthat country, some to be completed by the year 2014. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No  designs ? Hilary, check your generals long terms building projects of superbases inthat country, some to be completed by the year 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6604</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=7201#comment-6604</guid>
		<description>No long-term designs? Then why not just leave? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No long-term designs? Then why not just leave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: silqworm</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6599</link>
		<dc:creator>silqworm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=7201#comment-6599</guid>
		<description>Hillary is becoming more transparently evil all the time.  Look  at her left eye. Since those Pakistani women students told her off, and in light of everything everywhere showing her as a incompetent fool, coupled with glorification pieces in the NYT, Time Magazine, she is literally insane at this point, in my humble opinion. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary is becoming more transparently evil all the time.  Look  at her left eye. Since those Pakistani women students told her off, and in light of everything everywhere showing her as a incompetent fool, coupled with glorification pieces in the NYT, Time Magazine, she is literally insane at this point, in my humble opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jane Doe</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jane Doe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=7201#comment-6598</guid>
		<description>I would agree with the Caspian Sea oil theory, but we can and have negotiated with dictators and even the Taliban, and negotiation is much more cost effective than war. 
 
Plus we get our oil from Mexico, Canada, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezvuela.  Beyond Saudi Arabia we are not dependent on Middle Eastern or South Asian oil.   
 
And beyond that, any sane person, someone older than 8, would know that oil is a finite resource.   We could invade Mexico or Canada and be home on the weekends margaritas in hand. 
 
These wars are for Israel as Avigdor Lieberman kind-of said in March.  We have no business there and need to get out. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree with the Caspian Sea oil theory, but we can and have negotiated with dictators and even the Taliban, and negotiation is much more cost effective than war. </p>
<p>Plus we get our oil from Mexico, Canada, Nigeria, Saudi Arabia and Venezvuela.  Beyond Saudi Arabia we are not dependent on Middle Eastern or South Asian oil.   </p>
<p>And beyond that, any sane person, someone older than 8, would know that oil is a finite resource.   We could invade Mexico or Canada and be home on the weekends margaritas in hand. </p>
<p>These wars are for Israel as Avigdor Lieberman kind-of said in March.  We have no business there and need to get out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Biddulph</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/15/clinton-insists-us-doesnt-have-long-term-designs-on-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-6590</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Biddulph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 10:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=7201#comment-6590</guid>
		<description>No designs on Afghanistan. Really?  Yet it&#039;s clear from the Iraq history, the strategy is - has always been - liberate (invade), select a couple of lead guys from the politicians (thugs ) who&#039;ve been operating in and around for a while, hold a &quot;democratic&quot; election, and tell the one elected that he&#039;ll stay in power just as long as he continues to support American strategy for the area. 
 
And in the case of Afghanistan and all the &quot;Stan&quot; states, the strategy has been in place since at least Robert McFarlane&#039;s now declassified 1985 assessment of the area. It&#039;s Caspian Sea oil and gas, and keeping Russian in check.   </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No designs on Afghanistan. Really?  Yet it&#039;s clear from the Iraq history, the strategy is &#8211; has always been &#8211; liberate (invade), select a couple of lead guys from the politicians (thugs ) who&#039;ve been operating in and around for a while, hold a &quot;democratic&quot; election, and tell the one elected that he&#039;ll stay in power just as long as he continues to support American strategy for the area. </p>
<p>And in the case of Afghanistan and all the &quot;Stan&quot; states, the strategy has been in place since at least Robert McFarlane&#039;s now declassified 1985 assessment of the area. It&#039;s Caspian Sea oil and gas, and keeping Russian in check.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 10/21 queries in 0.127 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 12:05:18 -->
