<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clinton &#8216;Charm Offensive&#8217; Yields Growing Distrust in Pakistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaun</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-5954</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6966#comment-5954</guid>
		<description>That picture you&#039;ve got of clinton speaks a thousand words.  You can just imagine her there in Pakistan, angry students grilling her on drone strikes, with that look on her face as she says in effect &quot;i don&#039;t give a s#%%&quot;.  Great pick for chief diplomat Obama, great pick. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That picture you&#039;ve got of clinton speaks a thousand words.  You can just imagine her there in Pakistan, angry students grilling her on drone strikes, with that look on her face as she says in effect &quot;i don&#039;t give a s#%%&quot;.  Great pick for chief diplomat Obama, great pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connestee</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-5948</link>
		<dc:creator>Connestee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6966#comment-5948</guid>
		<description>HRC&#039;s visit was a failure, but the American people will hear how successful it was through our mainstream media. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HRC&#039;s visit was a failure, but the American people will hear how successful it was through our mainstream media.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ram Sharma</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-5941</link>
		<dc:creator>Ram Sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6966#comment-5941</guid>
		<description>Pak has been serving as asswipes of their American, European and now Chinese masters since partition. The people and the ruling paki  thugs had got too spoiled  receiving &quot;no string attached financial aid&quot; from America. Madam Hillary had to straighten them out. America does not want ass wiped with any ordinary tissue, it has to be Charmin brand and double ply. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pak has been serving as asswipes of their American, European and now Chinese masters since partition. The people and the ruling paki  thugs had got too spoiled  receiving &quot;no string attached financial aid&quot; from America. Madam Hillary had to straighten them out. America does not want ass wiped with any ordinary tissue, it has to be Charmin brand and double ply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peacegeek</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-5937</link>
		<dc:creator>Peacegeek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 14:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6966#comment-5937</guid>
		<description>Alas, Pakistan!  She was the front line for the western intelligence agencies during the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.  Pakistan has been marching to the tune of the west since 1979 -- and smartly, too - especially after 9/11.  We replaced Musharraf with Zardari - and his poll numbers plummet predictably.  Pakistanis are sick of the US presence in the region -- and some are dying as the result of collateral damage done by drones that are guided by pilots located half a world away.  What would Americans do if people in Montana and Idaho were being killed by Pakistani drones targeting Islamophobic militias?  I am surprised that 11% support a government that permits lethal military aggression by a superpower. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, Pakistan!  She was the front line for the western intelligence agencies during the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.  Pakistan has been marching to the tune of the west since 1979 &#8212; and smartly, too &#8211; especially after 9/11.  We replaced Musharraf with Zardari &#8211; and his poll numbers plummet predictably.  Pakistanis are sick of the US presence in the region &#8212; and some are dying as the result of collateral damage done by drones that are guided by pilots located half a world away.  What would Americans do if people in Montana and Idaho were being killed by Pakistani drones targeting Islamophobic militias?  I am surprised that 11% support a government that permits lethal military aggression by a superpower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadaguy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/11/01/clinton-charm-offensive-yields-growing-distrust-in-pakistan/comment-page-1/#comment-5923</link>
		<dc:creator>canadaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 04:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6966#comment-5923</guid>
		<description> 
I wrote an article about the future of Pakistan yesterday: 
 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.watchinghistory.com/2009/10/future-of-pakistan.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.watchinghistory.com/2009/10/future-of-...&lt;/a&gt; 
 
Their President Zardari only has the support of 11 percent of the people.  And only 11 percent of Pakistanis consider the Taliban a threat, but 59 percent consider the US the biggest threat to their country.  A government will so little support, acting completely against the interests of its people, is not one that can last forever. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article about the future of Pakistan yesterday: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.watchinghistory.com/2009/10/future-of-pakistan.html" target="_blank">http://www.watchinghistory.com/2009/10/future-of-&#8230;</a> </p>
<p>Their President Zardari only has the support of 11 percent of the people.  And only 11 percent of Pakistanis consider the Taliban a threat, but 59 percent consider the US the biggest threat to their country.  A government will so little support, acting completely against the interests of its people, is not one that can last forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/19 queries in 0.101 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 11:45:03 -->
