Comments on: Iran Deal on Brink of Collapse as West Condemns Compromise

By: Brainlego

Brainlego — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:27:47 +0000

This actually seems to be a repeat of the whole Iraq fiasco.

Bolton has actually admitted that he wishes diplomacy to fail:
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_jim_harr_…
Its all about finding a way to make it happen.

By: Valerianus

Valerianus — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:27:23 +0000

"But for Europeans, getting Iran to hand over the bulk of its uranium all at once was the best part of the deal, and they appear uninterested in continuing negotiations without that."

The European lackeys of the FedGov are "outraged" that they aren't going to be able to steal Iran's uranium. Too bad!

By: nolan

nolan — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:43:59 +0000

I’m mad at Iran. They’ve already bowed down to bullying powers more than I would like. These talks are pointless. If I was Iran I would have done what they did last year, send them a proposal NOT EVEN MENTIONING OUR PEACEFUL PROGRAM. Supporting Afghanistan, stopping illicit drug trading, Etc.

The UAE will get nukes before Iran does. Japan will get nukes before Iran does.

Instead of listening to the lobby they need to listen to their intelligence agencies. They need to listen to the IAEA.

By: Iran Deal on Brink of Collapse as West Condemns Compromise | America 20XY

Iran Deal on Brink of Collapse as West Condemns Compromise | America 20XY — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:18:46 +0000

[...] Anti-War.com [...]

By: Ron Paul: Sanctions on Iran are an Act of War! « Socio-Economics History Blog

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:09:28 +0000

[...] See also : Key US Senate panel approves sweeping Iran sanctions Iran Deal on Brink of Collapse as West Condemns Compromise [...]

By: paulBass

paulBass — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 01:31:42 +0000

step one – failed diplomacy
step two – failed sactions
step three – support internal revolution

repeat all steps until Americans are sufficiently frightened of being nuked in their jammies by a country with out nuclear weapons.
step four – spread democracy

as apposed to the republican strategy of "bomb bomb iran"

By: Den

Den — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:53:34 +0000

Iran’s concerns and suspicions about France are warranted since France had reneged on uranium hexaflouride shipments before. Can France be trusted? That is the 64 million dollar question.
Since France, the UK and the US are the loudest critics of Iran’s commercial nuclear energy policy, Iran has every reason to fear that possibility of betrayal again. The Iranian proposal makes sense because it would give France the opportunity to show that it would fulfill its role, and not renege again, and prove that the Iranians are sincere.

By: ChrisDowd

ChrisDowd — Thu, 29 Oct 2009 23:43:24 +0000

What a surprise- like the EU or the US ever had any intention of negotiating in good faith with Iran to begin with.