<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report: Karzai Has Only 47 Percent of Votes, Runoff Needed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/16/widespread-fraud-complicates-karzais-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/16/widespread-fraud-complicates-karzais-victory/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kris Krajewski</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/16/widespread-fraud-complicates-karzais-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5404</link>
		<dc:creator>Kris Krajewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6646#comment-5404</guid>
		<description>Wow!  
 
    But how does Karzai get not to be able to declare his older wishes to not have the American ruling of his government in both conscience and process? It is because the factions of the Taliban and some insurgencies who did not participate in the election earlier  last month, did not  wish to develop the WAR again.  
 
      Pesonally, i believe that Karzai should present the case of his views for the people&#039;s democracy, or then the allowance for America to be occupying as you said. But his enemies 9of anything resembling a democracy) don&#039;t seem to have an interset in even that. 
 
 
         Kris  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  </p>
<p>    But how does Karzai get not to be able to declare his older wishes to not have the American ruling of his government in both conscience and process? It is because the factions of the Taliban and some insurgencies who did not participate in the election earlier  last month, did not  wish to develop the WAR again.  </p>
<p>      Pesonally, i believe that Karzai should present the case of his views for the people&#039;s democracy, or then the allowance for America to be occupying as you said. But his enemies 9of anything resembling a democracy) don&#039;t seem to have an interset in even that. </p>
<p>         Kris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rybo1</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/16/widespread-fraud-complicates-karzais-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-5256</link>
		<dc:creator>rybo1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6646#comment-5256</guid>
		<description>I doubt that Karzai is even close to 47%. The US must try to make this circus look valid in some way. Let&#039;s have a war, destroy a country and throw them a phony election.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt that Karzai is even close to 47%. The US must try to make this circus look valid in some way. Let&#039;s have a war, destroy a country and throw them a phony election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/17 queries in 0.094 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 07:51:48 -->
