<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Already Approved Another 13,000 Troops for Afghan War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama schickt 15000 weitere Soldaten nach Afghanistan &#171; Revolution</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5218</link>
		<dc:creator>Obama schickt 15000 weitere Soldaten nach Afghanistan &#171; Revolution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 15:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5218</guid>
		<description>[...] und zum anderen handelt es sich um &quot;support troops&quot; (Ingenieure, Doktoren, etc.) ... Im September zog Obama allerdings 14000 &quot;support troops&quot; ab und ersetze sich durch 14000 Soldaten. Nun sind praktisch 13000 &quot;support troops&quot; zurück in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] und zum anderen handelt es sich um &quot;support troops&quot; (Ingenieure, Doktoren, etc.) &#8230; Im September zog Obama allerdings 14000 &quot;support troops&quot; ab und ersetze sich durch 14000 Soldaten. Nun sind praktisch 13000 &quot;support troops&quot; zurück in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Report: &#8216;Substantial Increase&#8217; in U.S. Troops Toward Afghanistan &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5138</link>
		<dc:creator>Report: &#8216;Substantial Increase&#8217; in U.S. Troops Toward Afghanistan &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5138</guid>
		<description>[...] The White House Newspeak directors have denied that Mr. Obama has made a decision as to whether or not the U.S. presence will be increased, but it&#8217;s been expected as the foreign policy end of Mr. Obama&#8217;s historically successful presidential campaign was built on exponentially escalating the occupation. With 68,000 combat troops scheduled to be present in Afghanistan by the end of 2009, the Administration has already &#8217;silently&#8217; approved the deployment of an additional 13,000 occupation troops. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The White House Newspeak directors have denied that Mr. Obama has made a decision as to whether or not the U.S. presence will be increased, but it&#8217;s been expected as the foreign policy end of Mr. Obama&#8217;s historically successful presidential campaign was built on exponentially escalating the occupation. With 68,000 combat troops scheduled to be present in Afghanistan by the end of 2009, the Administration has already &#8217;silently&#8217; approved the deployment of an additional 13,000 occupation troops. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadaguy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5098</link>
		<dc:creator>canadaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5098</guid>
		<description>This is true, the idea of the extended family has disappeared for a lot of people.  In the Great Depression and through WWII, families got back together (or literally, people went back to the family farm) and you had a whole network of people to work together and take care of kids.  You had parents, brothers and sisters (and their families), Aunts and Uncles and grandparents.  
  
For those who still have grandparents who lived through the great depression (or remember their stories), this is a good time to listen to them.  Unfortunately, as you say, we live in a different time now and most people live in the city, not on a farm.  Still, their values are something we need to rekindle.  Values like frugality, modesty, humility, perseverance.  
  
During WWII the American people sacrificed because they had to and they got the job done.  Maybe they didn&#039;t sacrifice as much as the British, but you still had the &quot;can do&quot; attitude back then.  People pulled together, rationed, and did what they could.  That&#039;s a history to be proud of.  I don&#039;t see Americans (or Canadians) willing to make even modest sacrifices today, unfortunately.  We could probably solve global warming with *half* the sacrifice our grandparents endured, but we&#039;re all too spoiled and entitled to be willing to even give it a go.  :( </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is true, the idea of the extended family has disappeared for a lot of people.  In the Great Depression and through WWII, families got back together (or literally, people went back to the family farm) and you had a whole network of people to work together and take care of kids.  You had parents, brothers and sisters (and their families), Aunts and Uncles and grandparents.  </p>
<p>For those who still have grandparents who lived through the great depression (or remember their stories), this is a good time to listen to them.  Unfortunately, as you say, we live in a different time now and most people live in the city, not on a farm.  Still, their values are something we need to rekindle.  Values like frugality, modesty, humility, perseverance.  </p>
<p>During WWII the American people sacrificed because they had to and they got the job done.  Maybe they didn&#39;t sacrifice as much as the British, but you still had the &quot;can do&quot; attitude back then.  People pulled together, rationed, and did what they could.  That&#39;s a history to be proud of.  I don&#39;t see Americans (or Canadians) willing to make even modest sacrifices today, unfortunately.  We could probably solve global warming with *half* the sacrifice our grandparents endured, but we&#39;re all too spoiled and entitled to be willing to even give it a go.  <img src='http://news.antiwar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braulio_</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5096</link>
		<dc:creator>braulio_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 13:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5096</guid>
		<description>Most of what you say is true, BUT people who live in third-world countries know how to survive in poverty because they have seen it all and been through it all before, (relative) prosperity and crushing poverty. The social fabric of many third-world societies is more tightly woven, so when poverty comes, they know how to respond. Families get together, live together, and eat together until the storm passes. Extended families have done these things before. Even extended families often live in the same towns or within close proximity.  
 
The US has none of that! Families have disintegrated with almost no elderly parents or grandparents living with sons and/or daughters as in third-world countries. Children in many US families are out the door by the time of their high school graduation, at least to the extent present conditions have not forced them to stay with their parents longer.  
 
When the governments, federal, state, and city, the FORMER lines of last resort in the US break down, people will not know how to respond or where to turn. They will face conditions outside their experience. Then you will see chaos. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of what you say is true, BUT people who live in third-world countries know how to survive in poverty because they have seen it all and been through it all before, (relative) prosperity and crushing poverty. The social fabric of many third-world societies is more tightly woven, so when poverty comes, they know how to respond. Families get together, live together, and eat together until the storm passes. Extended families have done these things before. Even extended families often live in the same towns or within close proximity.  </p>
<p>The US has none of that! Families have disintegrated with almost no elderly parents or grandparents living with sons and/or daughters as in third-world countries. Children in many US families are out the door by the time of their high school graduation, at least to the extent present conditions have not forced them to stay with their parents longer.  </p>
<p>When the governments, federal, state, and city, the FORMER lines of last resort in the US break down, people will not know how to respond or where to turn. They will face conditions outside their experience. Then you will see chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry_Clemens</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5085</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry_Clemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5085</guid>
		<description>This action by the president should confirm the obvious: there is not a dime&#039;s worth of diffrence between the Democratic and Republican parties. Both parties are owned lock, stock and barrel by the American Ruling Establishment. As long as there are hundreds of billions of dollars to be made from the empire&#039;s wars of imperialism, we will have war right up until the time that the American people are brought to utter financial ruin. That time is not far off. A word to the wise: get prepared, while you still have the opportunity to do so. In a short while, economic conditions throughout America are going to resemble those of a poverty stricken third-world nation. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This action by the president should confirm the obvious: there is not a dime&#39;s worth of diffrence between the Democratic and Republican parties. Both parties are owned lock, stock and barrel by the American Ruling Establishment. As long as there are hundreds of billions of dollars to be made from the empire&#39;s wars of imperialism, we will have war right up until the time that the American people are brought to utter financial ruin. That time is not far off. A word to the wise: get prepared, while you still have the opportunity to do so. In a short while, economic conditions throughout America are going to resemble those of a poverty stricken third-world nation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrewp111</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5083</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrewp111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5083</guid>
		<description>Hope and Change. Hope and Change. Pass the Hopium, and smoke it in your peace pipe. Only change is the little money left in your pocket after Obi taxes you to pay for all the &quot;reform&quot;. Hope and Change. Hope and Change. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope and Change. Hope and Change. Pass the Hopium, and smoke it in your peace pipe. Only change is the little money left in your pocket after Obi taxes you to pay for all the &quot;reform&quot;. Hope and Change. Hope and Change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrewp111</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5082</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrewp111</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5082</guid>
		<description>Next thing you know. Obama will institute a draft to get his troops. Just how will all his young foolish supporters take that!!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next thing you know. Obama will institute a draft to get his troops. Just how will all his young foolish supporters take that!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MvGuy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5078</link>
		<dc:creator>MvGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 08:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5078</guid>
		<description>Yaa, Alan, you may see the 13,OOO as capitulation,  but as a student of bargaining, I can tell you that the Pentagon boyz do NOT......  Remember it was 45,OOO...then Mr O &quot;studied&quot;........  Then it became OMG....we need those troops YESTERDAY.....or Al Qaeta&#039;s gonna WIN....  They did NOT envission 13 when they start with 45 and raise to 60......  13 will be an insault to them...  They will wanna get some of the agency guys to go right over there and show him the Zagruder film....again...and ..again...and. .again.   
   
Yeah, I have been disappointed in him too....   I wanted him to out all the 911 lies and deceptions......   
It didn&#039;t happen,  and I still believe if it [911] were really investigated, the bush/chainey repubs would need to flee to their friendly No. 1 Welfare Queen  and the primary or secondary recieptant of America&#039;s military largess.   But it was not how Rahm see&#039;s their role in &quot;G-ds Plan&quot; or whatever the fruck they are usin as their chart...   Sometimes I start wonderin what we would be talkin about at this time if John McCain had managed to slip in as president.......  but I remember that no matter how bad Pres. O seems, Pres. Mcain  would have been worse in policy and  in appearences, we would have had  imperial patriotism elevated to the new national religion...   With baseball   diamond sized flags and disabled former shock troops lecturing us about America&#039;s divine mission to vanquish all the ungodly wogs....... ..........   A fate I find somewhat less preferable to death and taxes.... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yaa, Alan, you may see the 13,OOO as capitulation,  but as a student of bargaining, I can tell you that the Pentagon boyz do NOT&#8230;&#8230;  Remember it was 45,OOO&#8230;then Mr O &quot;studied&quot;&#8230;&#8230;..  Then it became OMG&#8230;.we need those troops YESTERDAY&#8230;..or Al Qaeta&#39;s gonna WIN&#8230;.  They did NOT envission 13 when they start with 45 and raise to 60&#8230;&#8230;  13 will be an insault to them&#8230;  They will wanna get some of the agency guys to go right over there and show him the Zagruder film&#8230;.again&#8230;and ..again&#8230;and. .again.   </p>
<p>Yeah, I have been disappointed in him too&#8230;.   I wanted him to out all the 911 lies and deceptions&#8230;&#8230;<br />
It didn&#39;t happen,  and I still believe if it [911] were really investigated, the bush/chainey repubs would need to flee to their friendly No. 1 Welfare Queen  and the primary or secondary recieptant of America&#39;s military largess.   But it was not how Rahm see&#39;s their role in &quot;G-ds Plan&quot; or whatever the fruck they are usin as their chart&#8230;   Sometimes I start wonderin what we would be talkin about at this time if John McCain had managed to slip in as president&#8230;&#8230;.  but I remember that no matter how bad Pres. O seems, Pres. Mcain  would have been worse in policy and  in appearences, we would have had  imperial patriotism elevated to the new national religion&#8230;   With baseball   diamond sized flags and disabled former shock troops lecturing us about America&#39;s divine mission to vanquish all the ungodly wogs&#8230;&#8230;. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.   A fate I find somewhat less preferable to death and taxes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braulio_</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5097</link>
		<dc:creator>braulio_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5097</guid>
		<description>Most of what you say is true, BUT people who live in third-world countries know how to survive in poverty because they have seen it all and been through it all before, (relative) prosperity and crushing poverty. The social fabric of many third-world societies is more tightly woven, so when poverty comes, they know how to respond. Families get together, live together, and eat together until the storm passes. Extended families have done these things before. Even extended families often live in the same towns or within close proximity. 
 
The US has none of that!  Families have disintegrated with amost no elderly parents or grandparents living with sons and/or daughters as in third-world countries. Children in many US families are out the door by the time of their high school graduation, at least to the extent present conditions have not forced them to stay with their parents longer. 
 
When the governments, federal, state, and city, the FORMER lines of last resort in the US break down, people will not know how to respond or where to turn.  They will face conditions outside their experience.  Then you will see chaos. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of what you say is true, BUT people who live in third-world countries know how to survive in poverty because they have seen it all and been through it all before, (relative) prosperity and crushing poverty. The social fabric of many third-world societies is more tightly woven, so when poverty comes, they know how to respond. Families get together, live together, and eat together until the storm passes. Extended families have done these things before. Even extended families often live in the same towns or within close proximity. </p>
<p>The US has none of that!  Families have disintegrated with amost no elderly parents or grandparents living with sons and/or daughters as in third-world countries. Children in many US families are out the door by the time of their high school graduation, at least to the extent present conditions have not forced them to stay with their parents longer. </p>
<p>When the governments, federal, state, and city, the FORMER lines of last resort in the US break down, people will not know how to respond or where to turn.  They will face conditions outside their experience.  Then you will see chaos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: canadaguy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/13/obama-already-approved-another-13000-troops-for-afghan-war/comment-page-1/#comment-5091</link>
		<dc:creator>canadaguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 04:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6569#comment-5091</guid>
		<description> 
I don&#039;t mean to downplay the problems that people might be going through in the US, but it&#039;s just not the same thing as living in a third world country.  I have friends from Latin America who have said that homeless people in Canada and US live better than the average person in the third world (mostly because we waste so much, of course.) 
 
I hope the US ends the wars and uses the money for its own people.  We have universal health care here, and I think Americans would be better off with it too.  But even if none of this happens and things get bad, we have to put it in context.  Poor people in the US often still have cars and houses or apartments.  Even the homeless have access to clean, free drinking water.  A lot of people in Africa don&#039;t even get that.  I guess my point was just that it doesn&#039;t do anyone any good to exaggerate.  And it&#039;s an insult to third world people who would often give *anything* to live in even an improverished American society. 
 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t mean to downplay the problems that people might be going through in the US, but it&#039;s just not the same thing as living in a third world country.  I have friends from Latin America who have said that homeless people in Canada and US live better than the average person in the third world (mostly because we waste so much, of course.) </p>
<p>I hope the US ends the wars and uses the money for its own people.  We have universal health care here, and I think Americans would be better off with it too.  But even if none of this happens and things get bad, we have to put it in context.  Poor people in the US often still have cars and houses or apartments.  Even the homeless have access to clean, free drinking water.  A lot of people in Africa don&#039;t even get that.  I guess my point was just that it doesn&#039;t do anyone any good to exaggerate.  And it&#039;s an insult to third world people who would often give *anything* to live in even an improverished American society.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 12/30 queries in 0.367 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 11:36:18 -->
