Comments on: Asst. Treasury Sec.: Banks Back US Intervention

By: Syria Comment » Archives » Will Syria Give up the Golan as it Gave up Alexandretta?

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 12:40:01 +0000

[...] Assistant Secretary Details Banking Industry’s Key Role in Foreign Policy by Jason Ditz October 12, 2009 When covering America’s interventionist foreign policy, certain departments and agencies come up a lot. The Defense Department, certainly. The CIA, usually. The State Department, the NSA, the list goes on. Rarely does the Treasury Department come up, but maybe it should. [...]

By: IAF task force to fight Maoists. AFSPA Revision. RAHUL EXCURSIONS. MAMATA NAUTANKI, War Against China, Forgotten war against TERROR and super-brinjal in frying pan! Indo-Russia to extend military cooperation till 2020.FDI inflow growth up 40% « Pala

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:20:25 +0000

[...] Asst. Treasury Sec.: Banks Back US Intervention by Jason Ditz October 12, 2009 http://news.antiwar.com/2009/10/12/treasury-department-at-the-center-of-us-invention-abroad/ [...]

By: U.S. Volunteer Military Recruiting Surges at Historic Level « Little Alex in Wonderland

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:23:32 +0000

[...] The same banksters who manufactured this recession and unemployment surge are financially and morally [sic] supported escalating the warfare portion of the State. “Speaking at a conference for the American Bankers Association, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury David S. Cohen went into excruciating detail about his department’s role in ensuring that the American banking industry is on the front lines of fights the world over,” Jason Ditz reports at AntiWar.com. [...]

By: Henry_Clemens

Henry_Clemens — Wed, 14 Oct 2009 07:49:54 +0000

You can bet your sweet bippie American banks back U.S. interventions – especially the private banking cartel known as the FED! Corporations that make weapons need bank loans to run and expand their businesses. Politicians, who get political payola from the corporations to run for reelection, need the FED to create billions out of thin air so the government can buy weapons and pay the troops. Yep, a sweet deal all around for everyone, except; the thousands of soldiers who die or who are maimed for life, the hundreds of thousands of foreign civilians who die or who are maimed for life, and American taxpayers who pay the interest on the hundreds of billions of dollars the FED creates out of thin air. Lord Rothschild would be damned proud of his American protege. They learned their lessons well.

By: October 13, 2009 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes?

October 13, 2009 « Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:37:50 +0000

[...] “Asst. Treasury Sec.: Banks Back US Intervention When covering America’s interventionist foreign policy, certain departments and agencies come up a lot. The Defense Department, certainly. The CIA, usually. The State Department, the NSA, the list goes on. Rarely does the Treasury Department come up, but maybe it should.” [...]

By: bogi666

bogi666 — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:41:05 +0000

What a bunch of crap by this Ass't., Secretary about how the bankers can identify criminals or terrorists through banking. As for the laundering of drug money, globalization of capital makes it easier than ever. Just by walking around Cancun Mexico it can be determined what businesses are fronts for laundering money. It's no brainer. The DEA and other interested agencies don't even bother to put operatives on the ground because the bankers, especially, claim they can do it all by computer I guess. BANKERS WARS are not new, WW1 is known as the bankers war, the same bankers financing the opposing countries. It's even easier now especially with the "surge" when the Pentagon pays protection money to the Iraqi opposition to the US. occupation not to attack American troops there. The same country, the USA paying all the opposing forces, a bankers dream. In fact the reason for the opposition to the Soviet Union was that Lenin reneged on the bonds that the CZAR used for WW1. This USSR was kicked out of the international banking system which is why Lenin had to create an independent banking system. Anti Communism hysteria was used as the reason for opposing communism the tax paying public would be unlikely to support the defense costs for the sake of the bankers not being paid by the USSR because of the bonds the CZAR floated.

By: Ira7Epstein

Ira7Epstein — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:33:57 +0000

You mean the criminal banksters support the criminal wars of the American Foriegn Policy Establishment. Birds of a feather flock together.

By: Peaceful_Idiot

Peaceful_Idiot — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 06:41:52 +0000

I'm glad I pay attention to Ron Paul already know about the connection between banking and war.