Comments on: Analysis – Iran Debate Pretty Much Over

By: Warrior Society Radio » News » Liberals and Democrats Will Support the Coming Mass Murder Campaign Against Iran

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 05:35:54 +0000

[...] one would think they’d be more skeptical about the case for war than the average voter,” writes Jason Ditz. “And there is a pretty even split between pro-war and anti-war positions on the discussion. Lots [...]

By: Geo1671

Geo1671 — Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:46:05 +0000

"it is unlikely NATO is going to jump at the chance for another war"-I don't think so!
France Germany Canada Austrilia New Zealand are Zionist controlled–don't count them out.Any bets?

By: ericsiverson

ericsiverson — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 22:42:33 +0000

Russia offered their friends the Iranians , fuel for nuclear ractors for electrical generation , But Iran wants to enrich their own peacefull fuel . Its a good bet they want to enrich enough for nuclear bombs .. But it is not a fact , just like Iraqs WMDs were not a fact . It is a fact United States has bombed several countrie on what now is claimed to be false facts . Obama may just be softing up the world for Israels attacks Than Iran wont be mad at Russia and China or even the United States , we cant be held liable for what Israel does neither can Russia and China . The whole world can tell Israel they are acting bad . But the job will be done .

By: Henry_Clemens

Henry_Clemens — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:46:32 +0000

From what I've read, I strongly doubt Iran is seeking to build atomic bombs. But what if they are building them? How could anyone blame them? It must now seem to any foreign nation that the only way to deter unjustified, immoral and aggressive invasion by the United States of Force is to deploy nuclear weapons. An undeniable truth that every government in the world knows, but is hesitant to admit: God made powerful nations and God made weak nations, but is was Edward Teller and nuclear technology that made them all equal.

By: Michaelkenny

Michaelkenny — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:43:31 +0000

Re Slashdot: don't forget the professional bloggers, who will be on the pro-war side and who will be sending multiple messages from several IP addresses to make it look like a wide spread of opinion. If the split is 50-50, then I'd guess that the vast majority of genuine bloggers are anti-war. In practical terms, it is hard to see how the US could go to war with Iran, essentially for the reasons Mr Ditz sets out. A war of any kind will discredit the attacker and make Iran into the hero of most of the planet. It would also send the "allies" scurrying home from Iraq and Afghanistan, leaving the US firendless and with three unwinnable wars on its hands. I'd guess the pro war propaganda is manipulation coming from some Israeli/Israel Lobby source.

By: redspruce

redspruce — Tue, 29 Sep 2009 11:34:55 +0000

Duh. When was there ever a discussion?