<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adm. Mullen: More Troops, Much More Time Needed in Afghanistan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/09/15/adm-mullen-more-troops-much-more-time-needed-in-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/09/15/adm-mullen-more-troops-much-more-time-needed-in-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: braulio_</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/09/15/adm-mullen-more-troops-much-more-time-needed-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-4167</link>
		<dc:creator>braulio_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6069#comment-4167</guid>
		<description>It is not possible to discuss the number of troops on any basis other than fact. In a July 23 interview, Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said &quot;The US is not an occupation force in Afghanistan&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA&lt;/a&gt;&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt; . Now, less than two months later, he as talking about an additional 1,000 troops PLUS an anticipated 20,000 troops at a later date, all this with John McCain standing by as cheerleader!  
 
How can these people speak in front of cameras? How can Washington politicians continue to neglect the will of their constituents? How can they bear to look a veteran on his/her third tour for example, in the eye? How can they spend another day in Afghanistan without identifying any military objectives? Speaking in broad lush tones, Admiral Mullen wants to bring the Taliban into the political process, and knowing we cannot &quot;turn&quot; them all, those we cannot turn will have to be &quot;killed or captured,&quot; all while we are not an occupation force and with another 20,000 non-occupying troops on the way.  
 
All credibility is broken. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not possible to discuss the number of troops on any basis other than fact. In a July 23 interview, Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said &quot;The US is not an occupation force in Afghanistan&quot; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA" rel="nofollow">&lt;a href=&quot;</a><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA</a>&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;&gt;<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA</a> . Now, less than two months later, he as talking about an additional 1,000 troops PLUS an anticipated 20,000 troops at a later date, all this with John McCain standing by as cheerleader!  </p>
<p>How can these people speak in front of cameras? How can Washington politicians continue to neglect the will of their constituents? How can they bear to look a veteran on his/her third tour for example, in the eye? How can they spend another day in Afghanistan without identifying any military objectives? Speaking in broad lush tones, Admiral Mullen wants to bring the Taliban into the political process, and knowing we cannot &quot;turn&quot; them all, those we cannot turn will have to be &quot;killed or captured,&quot; all while we are not an occupation force and with another 20,000 non-occupying troops on the way.  </p>
<p>All credibility is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: braulio_</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/09/15/adm-mullen-more-troops-much-more-time-needed-in-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-4168</link>
		<dc:creator>braulio_</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 06:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=6069#comment-4168</guid>
		<description>It is not possible to discuss the number of troops on any basis other than fact.  In a July 23 interview, Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staffs, said &quot;The US is not an occupation force in Afghanistan&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA&lt;/a&gt; .  Now, less than two months later, he as talking about an additional 1,000 troops PLUS an anticipated 20,000 troops at a later date, all this with John McCain standing by as cheerleader!   
 
How can these people speak in front of cameras?  How can Washington politicians continue to neglect the will of their constituents?  How can they bear to look a veteran on his/her third tour for example, in the eye?  How can they spend another day in Afghanistan without identifying any military objectives?  Speaking in broad lush tones, Admiral Mullen wants to bring the Taliban into the political process, and knowing we cannot &quot;turn&quot; them all, those we cannot turn will have to be &quot;killed or captured,&quot; all while we are not an occupation force and with another 20,000 non-occupying troops on the way.   
 
All credibility is broken. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is not possible to discuss the number of troops on any basis other than fact.  In a July 23 interview, Admiral Mike Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chief of Staffs, said &quot;The US is not an occupation force in Afghanistan&quot; <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA" target="_blank">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FyFWQuOwtMA</a> .  Now, less than two months later, he as talking about an additional 1,000 troops PLUS an anticipated 20,000 troops at a later date, all this with John McCain standing by as cheerleader!   </p>
<p>How can these people speak in front of cameras?  How can Washington politicians continue to neglect the will of their constituents?  How can they bear to look a veteran on his/her third tour for example, in the eye?  How can they spend another day in Afghanistan without identifying any military objectives?  Speaking in broad lush tones, Admiral Mullen wants to bring the Taliban into the political process, and knowing we cannot &quot;turn&quot; them all, those we cannot turn will have to be &quot;killed or captured,&quot; all while we are not an occupation force and with another 20,000 non-occupying troops on the way.   </p>
<p>All credibility is broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.080 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 11:47:17 -->
