<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: July in Afghanistan: A Month of Worsts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/31/july-in-afghanistan-a-month-of-worsts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/31/july-in-afghanistan-a-month-of-worsts/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:29:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBigChadski</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/31/july-in-afghanistan-a-month-of-worsts/comment-page-1/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBigChadski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=5279#comment-3209</guid>
		<description>I just read an article in Foreign Affairs last night called, &quot;How to Flip the Taliban&quot; by Fotini Christa &amp; Michael Semple. They speak about Afghan history in which traditionally Afghan fighters tend to side with the winner in war time. Likewise, that we could easily do the same in our present situation by sitting down with the Taliban and talking about the current issues in Afghanistan. Likewise, giving leaders an opportunity to voice their opinion, and supporting cooperation between factions. However, it would seem that the U.S. is sticking with it&#039;s big stick type policy rather than having rational conversation and discussing grievances. I thought the article posed some interesting points. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read an article in Foreign Affairs last night called, &quot;How to Flip the Taliban&quot; by Fotini Christa &amp; Michael Semple. They speak about Afghan history in which traditionally Afghan fighters tend to side with the winner in war time. Likewise, that we could easily do the same in our present situation by sitting down with the Taliban and talking about the current issues in Afghanistan. Likewise, giving leaders an opportunity to voice their opinion, and supporting cooperation between factions. However, it would seem that the U.S. is sticking with it&#039;s big stick type policy rather than having rational conversation and discussing grievances. I thought the article posed some interesting points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BradSmith</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/07/31/july-in-afghanistan-a-month-of-worsts/comment-page-1/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>BradSmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 04:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=5279#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>One of the saddest commentaries is that the Dem&#039;s for the largest part have abondoned the anti-war movement. I guess it just goes to show how they were more anti-bush than pro peace.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the saddest commentaries is that the Dem&#039;s for the largest part have abondoned the anti-war movement. I guess it just goes to show how they were more anti-bush than pro peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/16 queries in 0.087 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 05:17:23 -->
