<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian Council: &#8216;No Major Irregularities&#8217; in Iran Vote</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/24/guardian-council-no-major-irregularities-in-iran-vote/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/24/guardian-council-no-major-irregularities-in-iran-vote/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 16:03:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: izirbat</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/24/guardian-council-no-major-irregularities-in-iran-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-2522</link>
		<dc:creator>izirbat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:11:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4648#comment-2522</guid>
		<description>Quite correct. 
Also in Iran you do not have to register for the election (as we do in the US). You simply have to show up with your Birth Cert (which has picture of the holder) or if out side of Iran to show up with your Passport. 
Therefore anyone can show up at any location and vote. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quite correct.<br />
Also in Iran you do not have to register for the election (as we do in the US). You simply have to show up with your Birth Cert (which has picture of the holder) or if out side of Iran to show up with your Passport.<br />
Therefore anyone can show up at any location and vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The GrassCity Gazette - Page 19 - Grasscity.com Forums</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/24/guardian-council-no-major-irregularities-in-iran-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-2518</link>
		<dc:creator>The GrassCity Gazette - Page 19 - Grasscity.com Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4648#comment-2518</guid>
		<description>[...] The GrassCity Gazette    Guardian Council: &quot;No major irregularities&quot; in Iran vote    [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The GrassCity Gazette    Guardian Council: &quot;No major irregularities&quot; in Iran vote    [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: edgarh</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/24/guardian-council-no-major-irregularities-in-iran-vote/comment-page-1/#comment-2512</link>
		<dc:creator>edgarh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 11:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4648#comment-2512</guid>
		<description>Iran normally has cities with over votes. While this may seem odd to Americans it is not unreasonable. In the United States there are multiple positions on the ballot. Therefore it is important that a voter casts his ballot in the constituency of his residence. Iran in its presidential election has only one office up for decision. There is no electoral college requiring residency based voting. Therefore, a person votes where he is. If a city has a ring of suburbs, many workers will vote near their place of employment, resulting in an over vote in the core city and an under vote in the bedroom communities.  Over votes stick out. Under votes do not. This is acceptable because they are not voting for a core city Congressman, State Senator or State Representative. Iran does not have America&#039;s elaborate system of absentee ballots because their electoral system does not require it. Such flexibility results in some numbers that seem odd when applied to the American model but which are reasonable given the Iranian model. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran normally has cities with over votes. While this may seem odd to Americans it is not unreasonable. In the United States there are multiple positions on the ballot. Therefore it is important that a voter casts his ballot in the constituency of his residence. Iran in its presidential election has only one office up for decision. There is no electoral college requiring residency based voting. Therefore, a person votes where he is. If a city has a ring of suburbs, many workers will vote near their place of employment, resulting in an over vote in the core city and an under vote in the bedroom communities.  Over votes stick out. Under votes do not. This is acceptable because they are not voting for a core city Congressman, State Senator or State Representative. Iran does not have America&#039;s elaborate system of absentee ballots because their electoral system does not require it. Such flexibility results in some numbers that seem odd when applied to the American model but which are reasonable given the Iranian model.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/18 queries in 0.063 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 08:49:52 -->
