<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Iran Extends Election Probe Amid Growing Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:14:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Briefing &#8212; 25th-26th June 2009 &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2502</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Briefing &#8212; 25th-26th June 2009 &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4622#comment-2502</guid>
		<description>[...] for the Guardian Council to investigate complaints about the presidential election five days. (AntiWar.com) The BBC posted video of more protesters clashing with Iran stormtroopers, that they believe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the Guardian Council to investigate complaints about the presidential election five days. (AntiWar.com) The BBC posted video of more protesters clashing with Iran stormtroopers, that they believe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BiancaSusak</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2490</link>
		<dc:creator>BiancaSusak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4622#comment-2490</guid>
		<description>All the caution has been thrown into the wind when it comes to reporting from Iran.  Finding that more people voted in some voting districts (not towns, as reported),  is nothing unusual.  It is not that the vote exceeds the registered voters,  it just exceeds the number of people voting in the same district in the previous election.   Iranian voter can be registered elsewhere,  but vote in the place of their current residence.   Ahmedinejad was predicted a winner by every poll conducted before election, and by 2:1 margin.  Extending the time for examination was an astute move.  All it will do is to expose other color revolutionaries hidden deeply in the Rafsanjani&#039;s network.    </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the caution has been thrown into the wind when it comes to reporting from Iran.  Finding that more people voted in some voting districts (not towns, as reported),  is nothing unusual.  It is not that the vote exceeds the registered voters,  it just exceeds the number of people voting in the same district in the previous election.   Iranian voter can be registered elsewhere,  but vote in the place of their current residence.   Ahmedinejad was predicted a winner by every poll conducted before election, and by 2:1 margin.  Extending the time for examination was an astute move.  All it will do is to expose other color revolutionaries hidden deeply in the Rafsanjani&#039;s network.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hinkus</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>Hinkus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4622#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised how many people here are guzzling the NeoCon Kool-Aid, when it comes to Mousavi.  Especially considering that the NeoCon Timmerman admits financing him. 
 
I expected more from Antiwar.com. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m surprised how many people here are guzzling the NeoCon Kool-Aid, when it comes to Mousavi.  Especially considering that the NeoCon Timmerman admits financing him. </p>
<p>I expected more from Antiwar.com.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iran Extends Election Probe Amid Growing Evidence &#8212; will to truth</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2482</link>
		<dc:creator>Iran Extends Election Probe Amid Growing Evidence &#8212; will to truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4622#comment-2482</guid>
		<description>[...] source [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] source [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WasHal</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/23/iran-extends-election-probe-amid-growing-evidence/comment-page-1/#comment-2477</link>
		<dc:creator>WasHal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4622#comment-2477</guid>
		<description>Mousavi seems to be following the American way of propaganda...repeat a &#039;statement&#039; so many times that it becomes difficult to deny it. He hasn&#039;t yet supported the accusation with hard evidence, but simply called for the election annulment. 
 
I wonder if the situation was reversed (that is Ahmedinejad had lost and his supporters were rioting), what would the US say. They would demand hard proof, and call Ahmedinejad a bad looser. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mousavi seems to be following the American way of propaganda&#8230;repeat a &#039;statement&#039; so many times that it becomes difficult to deny it. He hasn&#039;t yet supported the accusation with hard evidence, but simply called for the election annulment. </p>
<p>I wonder if the situation was reversed (that is Ahmedinejad had lost and his supporters were rioting), what would the US say. They would demand hard proof, and call Ahmedinejad a bad looser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/19 queries in 0.074 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 11:19:22 -->
