<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Despite Cabinet Statement, Iraq Referendum Delay Considered Unlikely</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/10/despite-cabinet-statement-iraq-referendum-delay-considered-unlikely/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/10/despite-cabinet-statement-iraq-referendum-delay-considered-unlikely/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 18:25:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daily Briefing &#8212; 11th June 2009 &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/10/despite-cabinet-statement-iraq-referendum-delay-considered-unlikely/comment-page-1/#comment-2257</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Briefing &#8212; 11th June 2009 &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4328#comment-2257</guid>
		<description>[...] A referendum to delay the Status of Forces Agreement for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq seems unlikely. (Antiwar.com) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A referendum to delay the Status of Forces Agreement for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq seems unlikely. (Antiwar.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MvGuy</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/10/despite-cabinet-statement-iraq-referendum-delay-considered-unlikely/comment-page-1/#comment-2252</link>
		<dc:creator>MvGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4328#comment-2252</guid>
		<description>O.K.!! </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K.!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cabinet Wants Iraq Pact Referendum Delayed Until 2010 -- News from Antiwar.com</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/10/despite-cabinet-statement-iraq-referendum-delay-considered-unlikely/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Cabinet Wants Iraq Pact Referendum Delayed Until 2010 -- News from Antiwar.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4328#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>[...] Note: The previous version of this article operated under the assumption that the cabinet&#8217;s call for a delay was a done deal. Members of the Iraqi Parliament however say the delay is unlikely to happen. The article has been changed to reflect this and a broader version of parliament&#8217;s comments can be found here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Note: The previous version of this article operated under the assumption that the cabinet&#8217;s call for a delay was a done deal. Members of the Iraqi Parliament however say the delay is unlikely to happen. The article has been changed to reflect this and a broader version of parliament&#8217;s comments can be found here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
