<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Army Holding Over 11,000 Detainees in Iraq</title>
	<atom:link href="http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/09/us-army-holding-over-11000-detainees-in-iraq/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/09/us-army-holding-over-11000-detainees-in-iraq/</link>
	<description>Original and up-to-date news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 23:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Briefing &#8212; 10th June 2009 &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://news.antiwar.com/2009/06/09/us-army-holding-over-11000-detainees-in-iraq/comment-page-1/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Briefing &#8212; 10th June 2009 &#171; Little Alex in Wonderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.antiwar.com/?p=4296#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>[...] U.S. occupiers are holding 11,057 detainees in Iraq. (Antiwar.com) 3,000 have been released since early March, but the rate of releasing detainees has dropped from [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] U.S. occupiers are holding 11,057 detainees in Iraq. (Antiwar.com) 3,000 have been released since early March, but the rate of releasing detainees has dropped from [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 9/15 queries in 0.288 seconds using disk: basic

Served from: news.antiwar.com @ 2012-02-10 15:23:45 -->
