Comments on: US Won’t Accept North Korea as a Nuclear State

By: KCPete

KCPete — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 12:53:22 +0000

i am sure that China would be as pleased to have N Korea as an American satellite on its' border, as Russia is with Georgia.
The treaty to supply NK with energy met the same fate as all the other American treaties (maybe they have heard of Wounded Knee) so they re-started their own energy supply.
The concept of USA starting another shooting war (in the Far East !!!) while they are enjoying such huge success in the Middle East is hilarious.
NK is saying "failure to live up to your agreements, has consequences".

By: U.S. Won’t Accept North Korea as a Nuclear State « Wonderland Wire

U.S. Won’t Accept North Korea as a Nuclear State « Wonderland Wire — Sun, 31 May 2009 16:16:02 +0000

[...] a comment » 30-31 May 09 | AWC News and [...]

By: Duncan__Idaho

Duncan__Idaho — Sun, 31 May 2009 12:27:49 +0000

Nobody is "dangerous" to the US, for the simple fact that NO ONE ELSE on this planet WANTS a nuclear war, no one but the United Snakes that is.

IMO, any state that does NOT strive for nuclear ICBM capability is committing an act of Treason. How else can you defend your sovereignty against the rapacious greed of the "free market" United Snakes???

By: paulBass

paulBass — Sun, 31 May 2009 08:42:26 +0000

and with the past few debacles im sure there will be strict adherence to the Powel doctrine

By: Pattonpaws

Pattonpaws — Sun, 31 May 2009 08:14:02 +0000

For a different perspective, I recommend "Chosen Nukes", by Israel Adam Shamir – May 29, 2009. Who is possibly more dangerous China with its nukes or North Korea? If the US will attack North Korea, it will use nuclear weapons. The Empire is aching to use its full capability as a lesson to everyone else, especially Iran. North Korea is a perfect patsy for this demonstration of hubris.

By: paulBass

paulBass — Sun, 31 May 2009 04:10:03 +0000

….hope…and….?